Atiku’s Subsidy Pledge: Relief for Nigerians or Return to Past Pitfalls?

When former Vice President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, on August 19, 2026, pledged to restore the petrol subsidy if elected president in 2027, his declaration immediately reignited a national political and economic debate, with stakeholders divided over whether the policy would ease Nigerians’ economic hardship or reverse reforms already undertaken in the petroleum sector.
From supporting phased subsidy removal under the Obasanjo administration and advocating complete removal during the 2023 presidential campaign, Atiku Abubakar’s recent pledge to restore a targeted petrol subsidy if elected president in 2027 has exposed him to public criticism over what opponents describe as a fluctuating stance on the policy.
The Presidency swiftly rejected Atiku’s proposal, characterising it as politically motivated and driven by a fundamental misunderstanding of national governance.
Presidential spokesperson Bayo Onanuga and Special Assistant Otega Ogra criticised Atiku for making what they termed a desperate policy U-turn to capitalize on public frustration, noting that his current position contradicts his explicit 2023 campaign promise to deregulate the market.
The presidency further claimed that restoring the subsidy would drain an unsustainable ₦19.1 trillion from the national budget annually.
Atiku countered by demanding a full accounting of the funds saved since the policy was scrapped in May 2023. He alleged that the reported savings have failed to translate into improved public welfare, security, or infrastructure, claiming instead that public funds remain vulnerable to mismanagement.

Clarifying the 2027 Domestic Refinery Proposal

Following conflicting statements from his media team regarding a potential phased-withdrawal approach, Atiku reaffirmed on his official social media channels that his primary stance remains unchanged.
He clarified that he is not advocating a return to the historic import-driven subsidy model, which he previously criticised as an inefficient system.
Instead, Atiku stressed that his 2027 plan centers on a targeted, audited intervention focused exclusively on domestic refining. Under this strategy, crude oil would be supplied to local refiners at capped, discounted rates.
The goal is to lower retail petrol prices, reduce operational costs for businesses, and ease inflation across transport, energy, and food sectors until market forces can independently deliver affordable pricing.

Broad Opposition and Alternative Economic Perspectives

Opposition political figures have also expressed strong skepticism regarding the proposal. Speaking at the August 2026 Nigerian Bar Association Conference, Peter Obi defended the initial removal of the fuel subsidy while criticizing the current administration’s deployment of the accrued savings.
Obi argued that ongoing economic pressures stem from a failure to strategically reinvest those funds into critical sectors like healthcare, education, and infrastructure, rather than from the termination of the price control policy itself.

Historic Context of Nigeria’s Price Control Policy

Nigeria’s petrol subsidy regime originated in 1977 under General Olusegun Obasanjo through the Price Control Act, designed to buffer citizens against global oil price volatility by legally mandating maximum retail prices.
Over five decades, this temporary intervention evolved into a deeply entrenched economic commitment until its complete removal on May 29, 2023, by President Bola Tinubu.

During his 2023 presidential campaign, Bola Tinubu made a firm, non-negotiable promise to remove the fuel subsidy immediately, a pledge he made a reality on May 29, 2023, the exact day he was sworn into office.

Within 24 hours of his speech, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) adjusted its official pricing template. Petrol prices instantly leaped from roughly ₦195 per litre to over ₦500 per litre across the nation, legally solidifying the end of the 46-year-old price control era on his very first afternoon in power.

RELATED NEWS:
Following the subsidy removal the federal government’s economic reform scorecard in December 2025 revealed that  Nigeria’s fuel subsidy reform generated ₦15.8 trillion in savings.
The government allocated these funds toward national minimum wage adjustments, state debt relief, local infrastructure support, and social safety nets such as the Nigerian Education Loan Fund.

Multi-Year Macroeconomic Trajectory

Data from the National Bureau of Statistics illustrates the shift triggered by deregulation.
In 2023, the immediate structural adjustment pushed retail fuel costs past ₦500 per litre, driving intra-city transport fares sharply upward and raising headline inflation to 28.20%.
By 2024, continued market deregulation alongside foreign exchange adjustments pushed petrol past ₦1,000 per litre, pushing headline inflation to a peak of 34.19% and driving substantial price increases in essential commodities.
Through 2025 and 2026, subsequent rebasing of the Consumer Price Index brought official inflation metrics down closer to 15%–16%. Despite this statistical reduction, retail costs for transport, energy, and staple foods remain elevated, sustaining pressure on household budgets.

Atiku’s Subsidy Plan Feasible If Properly Implemented — Prof Fage

Professor Kamilu Sani Fage of Bayero University, Kano, has described Atiku’s proposal to restore fuel subsidy through heavily discounted crude oil for local refineries as feasible, provided the government strictly enforces regulations and takes measures to prevent marketers from exploiting the policy.

Prof. Fage, who spoke exclusively with Pinnacle Daily, said Atiku’s change of position on subsidy should not necessarily be viewed as a political liability, arguing that public policies could be modified or abandoned when evidence shows that they were not achieving their intended objectives.

He described the criticism of Atiku’s position as largely political, noting that President Bola Tinubu also changed his position on fuel affordability after assuming office, despite campaign promises in 2023 that oil would be cheap and affordable in Nigeria.

According to him, policy analysis allows governments to evaluate existing policies and either continue, modify or completely abandon them based on feedback and outcomes.

“If we look at Atiku’s position that his subsidy will follow the barrel and that the subsidy will be for domestic refineries, that, to me, is feasible, provided certain measures are taken,” he said.

He stressed the need for strict enforcement of regulations, saying Nigeria’s problem was often not the absence of laws but the failure to enforce them.

Prof. Fage also called for measures to check the activities of marketers, arguing that some price increases in Nigeria were driven by attempts to take advantage of economic situations for excessive gains.

He maintained that effective implementation of the proposal could benefit Nigerians and help prevent a return to the problems associated with the existing system.

N19trn Subsidy Loss Claim

Reacting to the presidency’s claim that Atiku’s proposal could cost Nigeria about N19 trillion annually, Prof. Fage said there could be some financial losses from the domestic side but argued that the figure should be considered in the broader context of the policy.

He explained that Atiku’s plan focuses on strengthening domestic refineries to meet local energy needs. According to him, cheaper energy could lower production costs, support industries and increase economic activity, potentially generating revenue that could offset some subsidy costs.

Petrol Subsidy Return Won’t Fix Nigeria’s Real Problem, Bello Tells Pinnacle Daily

Speaking exclusively to Pinnacle Daily Dr Kazeem Bello, a global financial analyst and CEO of Afrique Capital and Equity Funds Limited, has warned that restoring petrol subsidy could recreate economic distortions and discourage investment.

Bello argued that Nigeria’s deeper problem is low wages and declining purchasing power rather than fuel prices alone.

He said blanket subsidies could also create pressure for similar interventions in electricity, transport and other sectors while leaving the underlying income problem unresolved.

He urged the government to prioritise higher wages, stronger disposable income and targeted welfare for genuinely vulnerable Nigerians.

Bello also challenged Atiku Abubakar to focus his 2027 economic plan on improving Nigerians’ earning power rather than returning to the subsidy regime, which he described as a “backwards strategy.”

The Road Ahead

As the 2027 election approaches, Atiku’s proposal is likely to remain a major economic and political talking point, particularly given his earlier support for subsidy removal.

While Professor Kamilu Sani Fage considers the proposal feasible if it is strictly regulated, targeted at domestic refineries and protected against exploitation by marketers, Dr Bello warns that returning to subsidy could recreate the economic distortions the policy was intended to eliminate.

Ultimately, the credibility of any subsidy policy may depend less on the promise itself than on how transparently, sustainably and effectively it is implemented and whether it delivers lasting relief to Nigerians .

Website |  + posts

Rafiyat Sadiq is a political, justice, and human rights reporter with Pinnacle Daily, known for fearless reporting and impactful storytelling. At Pinnacle Daily, she brings clarity and depth to issues shaping governance, democracy, and the protection of citizens’ rights.

Pinnacle Daily Newsletter

Elevate Your News Experience Join Pinnacle Daily’s newsletter and receive exclusive content, deep dives, and the latest news from experts.